Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<4162F2EB.4020408@x-ray.at>
Date:	Tue, 05 Oct 2004 21:15:55 +0200
From:	Reini Urban <rurban AT x-ray DOT at>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:1.8a3) Gecko/20040817
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Absence of mkgroup and mkpasswd man pages
References:	<NUTMEGMXb0zrAXBirbT0000028e AT NUTMEG DOT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM>
In-Reply-To:	<NUTMEGMXb0zrAXBirbT0000028e@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Dave Korn schrieb:
>   I'd go so far as to say that the docs should not only be a default package, it
> should be a compulsory package that can't be uninstalled, only updated.  Or
> perhaps it should just rolled into the cygwin base package.  Whatever, there's no
> good reason to allow people to install an un-documented cygwin, they'll only end
> up coming here with questions they would have known the answers to if they'd had
> the docs.

Agreed.

BTW: What about a man page for dllwrap?
It's a binutils binary, without any info nor man nor description
in the Cygwin/*.README.

I would want to write one, if I would understand it.
But then I wouldn't need it. (Catch 22)

I don't think that binutils wants to support it in their texinfo doc.
But please someone (Charles?) add some info either to cygwin-doc or 
binutils.
-- 
Reini Urban
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -