Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<4161BD84.3030807@x-ray.at>
Date:	Mon, 04 Oct 2004 23:15:48 +0200
From:	Reini Urban <rurban AT x-ray DOT at>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:1.8a3) Gecko/20040817
MIME-Version:	1.0
CC:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Bugzilla (was: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues)
References:	<NUTMEGw6lJiwOjseAdF0000023c AT NUTMEG DOT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <41617A93 DOT 6070203 AT x-ray DOT at> <19910627726 DOT 20041004184520 AT familiehaase DOT de> <20041004164801 DOT GN30976 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4161A053 DOT 7040501 AT x-ray DOT at> <20041004192725 DOT GC1905 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4161AFB3 DOT 7020408 AT x-ray DOT at> <20041004202743 DOT GE1905 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4161B73C DOT 5050601 AT x-ray DOT at>
In-Reply-To:	<4161B73C.5050601@x-ray.at>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Reini Urban schrieb:
> Product: add "Cygwin"

long description: Corinna?

> Version:
>   Should probably be based on the cygwin dll versions:
>          1.3.x
>          1.5.10
>          1.5.11
>          latest snapshot

Then there is the remaining problem with existing Redhat support for the 
official Cygwin version, which should be clearly marked as such.
Shouldn't that be a seperate Product, because Redhat obviously still 
supports another Cygwin product called "GNUpro" 1.6.x?

Version:
	1.0 (official)
         1.3.x
         1.5.10
         1.5.11
         snapshot

Problem: Should the package test releases also lead to tracker issues? 
Would be good to have. But where to add this, better how to enter it?
How to enter a package version number at all?
The current three categories don't carry that scenario.

The version number the user will see on entering the new bug
just reflects the cygwin dll version.
I don't see the light yet.
-- 
Reini Urban
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -