Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
content-class:	urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	RE: Request for a version/ revision/ release number for the whole Cygwin release/ distribution
Date:	Mon, 4 Oct 2004 14:21:55 -0400
Message-ID:	<3D848382FB72E249812901444C6BDB1D03E04E99@exchange.timesys.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
From:	"Robb, Sam" <sam DOT robb AT timesys DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id i94IQFg0008919

> It would seem that bin #1 is consuming the majority of the effort.  I
> think that by changing priorities and re-allocating people and
> resources, it should be possible to create integration tests and a
> "stable" distribution.  Such would increase Cygwin's acceptance and
> usage for potentially hundreds of millions of people.  Is this not a
> good thing?

Speaking for myself, as one of the package maintainers: I'm not
open to, nor willing to be, "re-allocated".  I *volunteered* as
a package maintainer in order to fill a particular position in
the Cygwin ecosystem.  I will continue to fill that position for
so long as it is interesting and fun for me to do so.

Someone trying to "re-allocate" me would immediately make the
position non-interesting, not-fun, and result in my volunteering
my time elsewhere.

-Samrobb


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -