Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<416023B6.1050805@x-ray.at>
Date:	Sun, 03 Oct 2004 18:07:18 +0200
From:	Reini Urban <rurban AT x-ray DOT at>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:1.8a3) Gecko/20040817
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Request for a version/ revision/ release number for the whole Cygwin release/ distribution
References:	<E1CDzj2-0005nR-00 AT mailhub-04 DOT inode DOT at>
In-Reply-To:	<E1CDzj2-0005nR-00@mailhub-04.inode.at>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Gary R. Van Sickle schrieb:
> It would increase the amount of work application developers (assuming you
> mean package maintainers) would have to do.  More work for no pay has never
> been welcomed by anybody in the history of the world.

Well, they only good reason to start such a project would be monetary 
benefits. Besides the simplification of having a (stable) cygwin 
snapshot release from time to time, where all packages play well together.

And I don't see any problems to charge money for such distributions, as 
long as the GPL and sourceware's additional restrictions (?) are honored.
Like every linux distributor makes money from selling CD's and charging 
for support. As long as on a server (publicly) the snapshot ("release") 
is also provided.
-- 
Reini


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -