Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<4154A0D5.C117AA80@dessent.net>
Date:	Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:33:57 -0700
From:	Brian Dessent <brian AT dessent DOT net>
Organization:	My own little world...
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Is setup.exe _supposed_ to delete the cygwin dll before attempting to run shell scripts?
References:	<NUTMEG1Ed28kIN4MmXK000000d1 AT NUTMEG DOT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <NUTMEGljWwY0VnkB4lt000000d7 AT NUTMEG DOT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <20040924164839 DOT GJ674 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20040924170321 DOT GL12802 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 61 DOT 0409241356130 DOT 880 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <011d01c4a266$19792470$78d96f83 AT robinson DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 61 DOT 0409241526430 DOT 20381 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <41549A76 DOT 221A8526 AT dessent DOT net> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 61 DOT 0409241804170 DOT 20381 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Igor Pechtchanski wrote:

> > You first get the depth-first order: D, C, B, A.
> 
> <PEDANTIC>
> Properly speaking, the depth-first order will be B, D, C, A...
> </PEDANTIC>

D'oh'

> Unfortunately, this won't work when you have circular dependencies (e.g.,
> cygwin <-> fileutils).

Oh, did I forget to say the graph must be a DAG before starting?  :) 
Anyway, there are heuristics that could be used to find the best
"feedback set" of edges for which removal would result in an acyclic
graph.  e.g. the one described at
<http://www2.toki.or.id/book/AlgDesignManual/BOOK/BOOK4/NODE182.HTM>

> I think Max's solution is probably the least complex short-term one (i.e.,
> run all preremove scripts in batch *before* removing any files, and hope
> for the best).

Yeah, probably true... I realize that people have probably already
suggested these solutions involving graph theory in the past.  And as
you point out, a working patch is one thing, a bunch of conjecture is
another.

Brian

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -