delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On Sep 24 07:51, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > >On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 07:42:05AM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > > > >>I'm trying to understand why one would want ntsec on by default and > >>smbntsec off by default? > > > >smbntsec doesn't work reliably given the variability of smb servers. > > Still seems strange to me. If off it doesn't work at all (right?)! Even > if it worked 50% of the time that's 50% better than 0%. What's strange in having an unreliable option only switched on if the user really wants it and (hopefully) knows what (s)he's doing? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |