Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:39:41 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [OT] PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.
Message-ID:	<20040923143941.GI16115@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<NUTMEGx2ThBlwRTD9yN00000057 AT NUTMEG DOT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<NUTMEGx2ThBlwRTD9yN00000057@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i
Note-from-DJ:	This may be spam

On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:14:39PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>_Now_ is it on-topic?

:-)

I have to point out that I'm getting spam to some new accounts which
have only been used to send email to mailing lists which munge addresses
with the "me at cgf dot cx" method, so this isn't foolproof.

<idle speculation>
Hmm.  I wonder if I just replaced all of the '@'s with a png of an '@',
if that would foil the spammers.
<pause>
Nope.  Wouldn't work for the text archives.
</idle speculation>

I *really* have to dust off the filter that I was working on which
removed the host part of "unimportant" email addresses before they got
to the archives.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -