delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2004/09/20/06:02:24

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <414EAA70.2090700@kaffe.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:01:20 +0200
From: Dalibor Topic <robilad AT kaffe DOT org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040413 Debian/1.6-5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Gerrit @ cygwin" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
CC: "Grzegorz B. Prokopski" <gadek AT debian DOT org>
Subject: Cygwin-specific Libtool patches (Was Re: Is cygffi.dll needed for SableVM JVM?)
References: <20040906021844 DOT 84591 DOT qmail AT web53304 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <1095382062 DOT 1234 DOT 164 DOT camel AT gadek DOT homelinux DOT org> <1729140505 DOT 20040917144223 AT familiehaase DOT de> <1095453892 DOT 21655 DOT 265 DOT camel AT glue> <1902690 DOT 20040918145110 AT familiehaase DOT de>
In-Reply-To: <1902690.20040918145110@familiehaase.de>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Gerrit P. Haase wrote:

> It is as is for backward compatibility, new created DLLs don't need
> all the stuff with __declspec(import/export), however, some libs still
> use it and if you link against one which uses import/export
> definitions it may break things when using pass_all.   Then there are
> still some problems with exporting data, so it may also be needed to
> use import/export definitions with DLLs containing data, and then it
> would break too.  As long as you have libraries which don't use
> import/export definitions and since all code is PIC on Windows anyway,
> you may safely use pass_all.

I was wondering whether you know if there are pending patches from 
Cygwin developers for GNU Libtool, as they are preparing Libtool 2.0, so 
it would be nice to have those included, if possible :) The Libtool 
upstream is very cooperative and responsive to patches in my experience.

cheers,
dalibor topic

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019