Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Dave Korn" <dk AT artimi DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: checking for working mmap...no
Date:	Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:49:36 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20040916084702.GA29191@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Message-ID:	<NUTMEGJswFCHOzyfyz50000001d@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	16 Sep 2004 15:49:36.0406 (UTC) FILETIME=[C484DB60:01C49C04]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner@ On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen
> Sent: 16 September 2004 09:47

> The mmap test is crap.  How can an application expect to be able to
> access just about every address together with MAP_FIXED?
> 
> Consequentially MapViewOfFileEx returns error 487 in these cases,
> "Attempt to access invalid address."
> 
> That's just another example of a crappy autoconf mmap test.


  I just *knew* they were asking for trouble when they introduced
AC_CRAPPY_MMAP_TEST macro in autoconf-2.53!


    cheers, 
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -