Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 14 Sep 2004 09:00:32 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: 1.5.10: expr + configure failure + testcase (also on 1.5.11-1)
Message-ID:	<20040914130032.GC32582@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<90459864DAD67D43BDD3D517DEFC2F7D7114 AT axon DOT Axentia DOT local>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<90459864DAD67D43BDD3D517DEFC2F7D7114@axon.Axentia.local>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 08:11:39AM +0200, Peter Ekberg wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>I was thinking the same thing but AFAIK, ash doesn't have the pid
>>recycling problem.
>
>Don't know where ash comes into play, the script is executed by bash.
>I must have missed some other test case...

Remember this?

>On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 03:05:01AM -0400, Bogdan Vacaliuc wrote:
>>4) http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-08/msg00449.html
>>   thru http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-08/msg00556.html
>>
>>This relates to Manfred Spraul's patch for bash related to RECYCLES_PIDS.  I
>>have observed the failure to occur under (a)sh, and bash 2.04.5, 2.05b and
                                            ****
>>3.00.0 ( I compiled them all, including enabling the RECYCLES_PIDS for bash
>>2.05b ).

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -