delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | Mark Bohlman <mbohlman AT tcicredit DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: What is this |
Date: | Tue, 07 Sep 2004 09:32:58 -0400 |
Lines: | 63 |
Message-ID: | <chkdaa$ah1$1@sea.gmane.org> |
References: | <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 61 DOT 0409062256400 DOT 2779 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <NUTMEGwkrBEEBZYuIfc000011c5 AT NUTMEG DOT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Complaints-To: | usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org |
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: | exchange.tcicredit.com |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 |
In-Reply-To: | <NUTMEGwkrBEEBZYuIfc000011c5@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM> |
X-Enigmail-Version: | 0.85.0.0 |
X-Enigmail-Supports: | pgp-inline, pgp-mime |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Dave Korn wrote: >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Igor Pechtchanski >>Sent: 07 September 2004 03:57 > > >>On Mon, 6 Sep 2004, Dave Korn wrote: >> >> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Phil Betts >>>>Sent: 06 September 2004 12:34 >>> >>>>>Brian Dessent wrote: >>>> >>>>>"Mirko Tebaldi (Indirizzo Pubblico)" wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>What is /bin/test.exe ? >>>>>> >>>>>>i have a script that uses that, but it has not output >> >>and no --help >> >>>>>>or --usage !!! >>>> >>>>>Have you considered "man test"? >>>> >>>>FWIW, this should always be the FIRST thing one tries (or >>>>"info test"). >>>> >>>>It's a REALLY bad idea to execute a program to try to >> >>find out what it >> >>>>does. Suppose that "test" was an acronym for "Trash Entire System >>>>Thoroughly", and suppose that it ignored the command line. >>> >>> Then it would be a windoze app, not a unix/linux/posix >> >>one, and hence >> >>>off-topic for this list! >>> >>> I still think it should be entered into the OLOCA, though. >> >>That would be up there with "the whole new level of mean"... >>Are you sure we're up for it? :-) > > > I think we have to be daring! > > Just imagine the fun! > > "All patches must be thoroughly TESTed (http://cygwin.com/acronyms#test) > before submission"! > > > cheers, > DaveK And TESTED is "Trash Entire System Thoroughly at End of Day"?? ;-) (see also "Been There, Done That"). -- Mark -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |