Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:26:31 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: _PC_SYMLINK_MAX and other #defines missing from <unistd.h>
Message-ID:	<20040820042631.GA26717@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<s124e82e DOT 039 AT gateway DOT crch DOT hawaii DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<s124e82e.039@gateway.crch.hawaii.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 05:49:16PM -1000, Peter Hinely wrote:
>It seems _PC_SYMLINK_MAX and some other #defines missing from <unistd.h>
>
>Here is a description of the values:
>http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/pathconf.html
>http://www.greatsnakes.com/Sepal/d9/d7/unistd_8h.html
>
>Some of them are there in the implementation, while some of them are
>missing from the implementation.

Right.  Some are implemented some aren't.

Feel free to send patches which implement the missing ones.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -