Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:30:11 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Slashdot: cygwin in a Production Environment?
Message-ID:	<20040813133011.GC32180@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<Pine DOT CYG DOT 4 DOT 61 DOT 0408130020260 DOT 800 AT pervalidus>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.CYG.4.61.0408130020260.800@pervalidus>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 12:20:50AM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
>I noticed that story on Slashdot -
>http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/08/12/1932246 . May
>be of interest for some people (or not).

Interesting how some of the vaguely erroneous entries are modded up as
"interesting" or "informative".

Seems like at least some people think that somehow "Red Hat" has put its
full corporate might behind cygwin, which is pretty funny.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -