delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2004/08/03/18:47:10

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.0.20040803214639.02a81630@pop.mail.yahoo.fr>
X-Sender: mos_fr AT pop DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT fr
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 21:46:45 -0100
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Mos <mos_fr AT yahoo DOT fr>
Subject: Re: Initdb FATAL error shmat - Win98 Cygwin 1.5.10-3 - PostgreSQL 7.4.3
Cc: jason AT tishler DOT net
Mime-Version: 1.0

I install PostgreSQL 7.4.2 today without changing Cygwin install. Initdb 
works fine : initialization is good !

Mos

-----------------

On Aug  2 20:57, Mos wrote:
 > Hi there !
 >
 >
 > I have a problem to work with PostgreSQL with Cygwin.
 >
 > My OS is Windows 98 and I install cygwin full package, following numerous
 > tutorials available on the Net.
 >
 > All is fine except, I can not initialize a database :
 > All is fine until i try to initialize the database :
 >
 > ---------------
 > creating directory /usr/local/pgsql/data... ok
 > creating directory /usr/local/pgsql/data/base... ok
 > creating directory /usr/local/pgsql/data/global... ok
 > creating directory /usr/local/pgsql/data/pg_xlog... ok
 > creating directory /usr/local/pgsql/data/pg_clog... ok
 > selecting default max_connections... 10
 > selecting default shared_buffers... 50
 > creating configuration files... ok
 > creating template1 database in /usr/local/pgsql/data/base/1... FATAL:
 > shmat<id=
 > 1179648> failed: Invalid argument

I tried it and it actually only happens on 9x.  I found that postgres
tries to shmat to an address which I have no idea about where it comes
from.  The problem with that address is, that it's neither a multiple
of SHMLBA, nor does postgres call shmat with the SHM_RND flag.  For some
reason the address is ok on NT.

So, Jason, do you have an idea why that happens?  Two questions come to mind:

- How does postgres evaluate that address and why does it only fail on 9x?

- Why does postgres use a fixed address at all, instead of using NULL to
   let the system decide which address to use?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Co-Project 
Leader          <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

wi  


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019