Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	"cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	follow-up re textmode problem for relative paths, nobinmode env variable
From:	Joseph <sevenrider AT express56 DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Date:	Wed, 28 Jul 2004 01:15:31 -0400
Message-ID:	<opsbt0v5zalh6y6a@localhost>
User-Agent:	Opera7.23/Win32 M2 build 3227

a few weeks ago I asked about what
mount commands to use in order to
simulate the set-up I had on an
older version of Cygwin which had
textmode as the default for opening
files

I did not explicitly change
the default mount settings from
that version, which it reports
as

c: on /cygdrive/c type user (textmode, noumount)

with the latest version that I have
upgraded to however, there is no
combination of mount commands that
I can find that allows me to open
all files in textmode by default

in particular, if I mount / to be
textmode, I can get this behavior
only if I use the full absolute
path of the file I am opening,
but if I use a relative path
specification, file is opened
as binary data

it would be great if I could set
the CYGWIN environment variable to
nobinmode in order to avoid this
problem (and also to avoid having
to set up mounts for every other
drive besides C: that I might use),
but doing so seems to have no effect

I am not sure if this is a problem
with how I am doing it, or if that
setting for the environment variable
is no longer honored

someone who replied to my earlier
post on this topic said that I
should not expect the Cygwin
module to support nobinmode
in the environment variable
anymore

yet the lastest documentation I
can find in the download package
seems to indicate that this is
supposed to still be a viable option

any clarification on either of
these 2 related points would be
appreciated

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -