Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning:	slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs
Date:	Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:36:40 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Igor Pechtchanski <pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	Chris January <chris AT atomice DOT net>
cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	RE: cat /proc/registry/HKEY_PERFOMANCE_DATA/@ hangs
In-Reply-To:	<000001c46dba$8853e280$0207a8c0@avocado>
Message-ID:	<Pine.GSO.4.58.0407191430380.10492@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
References:	<000001c46dba$8853e280$0207a8c0 AT avocado>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Scanned-By:	MIMEDefang 2.39

On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Chris January wrote:

> > However, the fix is not as simple as inserting a "size =
> > bufalloc;" just before the RegQueryValueEx.  When I do that,
> > I get a SIGSEGV in the guts of iasperf.dll, which I have yet
> > to track down.  This happens on the second iteration, FWIW,
> > with buffer increment of 1000.  I'm going to investigate some
> > more, but I'd say that with the above bug, this key was never
> > tested, so I have no idea what's going on.  Hopefully Chris
> > (January) can use this to help him track down the problem.
>
> I'm back from my honeymoon (!)

Great, hope you enjoyed it...

> and I've just been catching up on this thread.

...and I'm sure you didn't enjoy this. :-)

> Are you still seeing the segfault Igor? If so I'll try to track it down
> if I have any spare time.

Yes, I'm still seeing the segfault in the latest snapshot, but only when
run under gdb or strace.  Here are some sample tests:

$ cat /proc/registry/HKEY_PERFORMANCE_DATA/\@ > e.out
cat: /proc/registry/HKEY_PERFORMANCE_DATA/@: No such file or directory
$ # no segfault
$ strace -o cat_HKPD.strace cat /proc/registry/HKEY_PERFORMANCE_DATA/\@ > e.out
2262669 [main] cat 2400 handle_exceptions: Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION
2264445 [main] cat 2400 open_stackdumpfile: Dumping stack trace to cat.exe.stackdump
$

I can also send you cat_HKPD.strace, but it's not very informative.  Let
me know if you can't reproduce this and need me to debug this locally.
FWIW, I have a working piece of Win32 code that does read this key
correctly (essentially a stripped down MS example).  Let me know if you
need it.

> As you can probably tell I never tested the HKEY_PERFORMANCE_DATA key.

Yep, so I surmised.

> Increasing the buffer size in increments is of course boilerplate code
> but I managed to cod it up regardless. Sigh.
>
> Chris January

HTH,
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_		pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster."  -- Patrick Naughton

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -