Mail Archives: cygwin/2004/07/13/18:44:25
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 06:20:19PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > Perhaps bufalloc += max(bufalloc, 1000);
Gack! I meant min() :)
> Sorry, but no. This will do nothing for the original problem. The idea
> was that at some point you need the rate of buffer size increase to
> overtake the rate of performance data generation. If performance data is
> generated faster than 1000 bytes per query, and adding 1000 bytes isn't
> enough, adding *at most* 1000 bytes (as you suggested) is strictly less
> effective. I suggested a linear function with a steeper slope (which may
> not be enough) or an exponential, which will definitely be enough, but may
> introduce huge buffers.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -