Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Dave Korn" <dk AT artimi DOT com>
To:	"'Cygwin List'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	[OT] RE: Source Code for cygwin1.dll
Date:	Mon, 12 Jul 2004 23:13:46 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<6.1.0.6.0.20040712173013.033473d0@pop.prospeed.net>
Message-ID:	<NUTMEGaZbLAX3cf3edn0000080e@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	12 Jul 2004 22:13:47.0140 (UTC) FILETIME=[80903C40:01C4685D]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Larry Hall
> Sent: 12 July 2004 22:40
> To: Hannu E K Nevalainen; Cygwin List
> Subject: RE: Source Code for cygwin1.dll

> >FWIW:
> >Seems there is still something "wrong" with your 
> configuration, a "Reply to
> >All" on the message (as quoted above) of yours yields
> > "Cygwin List; Dave Korn" in the TO field (Dave shouldn't be 
> there IMO).
> 
> 
> That's not wrong.  A "Reply to All" means reply to all who 
> were originally 
> addressed.  Since the original came from David and he 
> (apparently) didn't
> set his "Reply-To" (which Eudora will honor) to the list (for 
> example), he 
> is correctly included in the "Reply to All".

  Absolutely so.  It doesn't matter to me, Ouchlook seems to manage to
identify dupes (by the msg-id presumably) and I only see one copy anyway.
So I don't bother with Reply-To:

    cheers, 
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -