Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-To:	Cygwin List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-Id:	<6.1.0.6.0.20040711211001.0332c9b0@pop.prospeed.net>
X-Sender:
Date:	Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:17:15 -0400
To:	"GARY VANSICKLE" <g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
From:	Larry Hall <cygwin-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")
In-Reply-To:	<200407120047.i6C0lJi6014306@ns2.prospeed.net>
References:	<20040711235523 DOT GB603 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <200407120047 DOT i6C0lJi6014306 AT ns2 DOT prospeed DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0

At 08:47 PM 7/11/2004, you wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 09:54:05AM -0500, Eduardo Chappa wrote:
>> >That was CGF himself, he volunteered to not to volunteer. He brought 
>> >this topic onto himself.
>> 
>> This statement is disingenuous.  For shame.
>> 
>
>Perhaps, perhaps not.  I'm still waiting for somebody, other than you
>Chris[1], to tell me who asked you to do anything about anything discussed
>here (prior to the replied-to post; I see there was a "deal" subsequently
>proposed that did in fact ask for some tit-for-tat action).
>
>[1] This exception is of course an attempt to help prevent this message from
>being misinterpreted as a demand for you to do anything.  It is not, and is
>not to be misconstrued as such.  Nor, in fact, is it to be construed as a
>demand for anybody else to do anything either.  One would hope this would be
>clear from the complete lack of demands or implications of demands contained
>herin, but when in Rome....
>
>Oh, and BTW, whatever anybody wants to convince themselves of, if you're
>pointing folks to Google to get info out of your archives (which contain
>their own seach feature), your archives are broken.  DISCLAIMER: That was
>the Royal "Your", not to be construed as "Chris' archives" etc.
>
>Remember, denial is stage one.


I'm not sure what you're looking to get from someone responding to your
inquiry but from my perspective, based on what you've said, this just 
prolongs a thread that has drifted beyond the scope of the original 
inquiry and no longer serves a constructive purpose.  If you can succinctly
point to one, then perhaps it's still worthwhile to continue this thread.
Otherwise, let's just let it die and move on.  I think all relevant points
have been made already. 



--
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746                     


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -