Mail Archives: cygwin/2004/07/11/20:47:10
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 09:54:05AM -0500, Eduardo Chappa wrote:
> >That was CGF himself, he volunteered to not to volunteer. He brought
> >this topic onto himself.
>
> This statement is disingenuous. For shame.
>
Perhaps, perhaps not. I'm still waiting for somebody, other than you
Chris[1], to tell me who asked you to do anything about anything discussed
here (prior to the replied-to post; I see there was a "deal" subsequently
proposed that did in fact ask for some tit-for-tat action).
[1] This exception is of course an attempt to help prevent this message from
being misinterpreted as a demand for you to do anything. It is not, and is
not to be misconstrued as such. Nor, in fact, is it to be construed as a
demand for anybody else to do anything either. One would hope this would be
clear from the complete lack of demands or implications of demands contained
herin, but when in Rome....
Oh, and BTW, whatever anybody wants to convince themselves of, if you're
pointing folks to Google to get info out of your archives (which contain
their own seach feature), your archives are broken. DISCLAIMER: That was
the Royal "Your", not to be construed as "Chris' archives" etc.
Remember, denial is stage one.
--
Gary R. Van Sickle
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -