Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<40E44433.4090204@salomon.at>
Date:	Thu, 01 Jul 2004 19:04:51 +0200
From:	Michael Haubenwallner <michael DOT haubenwallner AT salomon DOT at>
User-Agent:	Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040601)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
CC:	RaoulGough AT yahoo DOT co DOT uk
Subject:	Problems linking stdcall functions from DLL
X-Virus-Scanned:	by AMaViS perl-11

Some time ago, there was a question about linking third party dll's
with cdecl function declarations but without the @x-decorations:
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-09/msg00307.html

Is there already a solution for this problem, as i've seen
this test not working yet with recent binutils-20040312-1/
gcc-3.3.1-3 on cygwin-1.5.10-3 ?

Would the use of LoadLibrary()/GetProcAddress() help
to keep the stack valid ?

Thought just to mention an interesting site i've found about this:
http://mywebpage.netscape.com/yongweiwu/stdcall.htm

Thanks,
   Michael Haubenwallner
-- 
Michael Haubenwallner                    SALOMON Automation GmbH
Forschung & Entwicklung                  A-8114 Friesach bei Graz
mailto:michael DOT haubenwallner AT salomon DOT at  http://www.salomon.at

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -