Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:42:47 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: higher-level IO very slow with cygwin1.dll 5.10 (due to set_flags?)
Message-ID:	<20040623034247.GD21621@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<1087960457 DOT 1fmsxb98l18g AT webmail DOT express56 DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<1087960457.1fmsxb98l18g@webmail.express56.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 11:14:17PM -0400, sevenrider AT express56 DOT com wrote:
>I am just asking again about this problem in the hopes that someone
>might have anything to suggest.  It seems that fopen is 10 to 20 times
>slower than open on my I/O operations due to large delays in executing
>a system call "set_flags".  I will have to rewrite all my code and
>abandon most of the text utility programs like "grep" and "sort" unless
>I can figure out what is going on.

Seems like if you are going to go to the effort of rewriting everything
you might first want to debug cygwin and find out where the time is
going...
--
Christopher Faylor			spammer? ->	aaaspam AT sourceware DOT org
Cygwin Co-Project Leader				aaaspam AT duffek DOT com
TimeSys, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -