Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Dave Korn" <dk AT artimi DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: db & mingw
Date:	Mon, 21 Jun 2004 18:47:56 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<u8yegu84s.fsf@gnu.org>
Message-ID:	<NUTMEGSl1tMVyoz5Bl8000004a9@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	21 Jun 2004 17:47:56.0781 (UTC) FILETIME=[E2BBD9D0:01C457B7]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Sam Steingold
> Sent: 21 June 2004 18:35
> To: cygwin
> Subject: db & mingw
> 
> it appears that "gcc -mno-cygwin" 

  That's a problem for the MinGW list then.  The includes and libraries for
the cygwin compiler and the MinGW compiler are essentially independent of
each other.  It may well be that MinGW have decided not to support B-DB, but
you'd have to ask them.

    cheers, 
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -