Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<40D353CA.7010905@dynetics.com>
Date:	Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:42:50 -0500
From:	"Douglas A. Vechinski" <douglas DOT vechinski AT dynetics DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Poor execution speeds using -mno-cygwin g77 option
References:	<40D34454 DOT 4050103 AT dynetics DOT com> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0406181544140 DOT 3356 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.58.0406181544140.3356@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
X-MailScanner-Information:	Contact the Computer Center for more information
X-MailScanner:	Found to be clean

Igor Pechtchanski wrote:

>>Even though Case C, when the -mno-cygwin flag is not used, the
>>difference is still significant. compared to Case A.
>>    
>>
>
>That's not surprising.  Cygwin is a POSIX emulation environment *on top*
>of Windows -- naturally the performance of any Cygwin tool will be slower
>than that of an equivalent pure Windows tool.  The MinGW case is
>surprising, but doesn't belong on this list.
>  
>
I was planning on sending the question to Mingw32.  I never have been 
totally clear on how separate and distinct Cygwin and Mingw32 are.

>>Is this a Cygwin problem, or g77 problem or something else.  I don't
>>recall experiencing such differences several years ago when doing the
>>same thing.
>>    
>>
>
>Things evolve.  It's possible that some system calls got speeded up on
>Linux (or, though doubtful, that some system calls got slowed down on
>Windows).  Are you using the same exact options to compile (keep in mind
>that the defaults may be different on Linux and Cygwin)?  As a WAG, are
>you using floating point emulation instead of hardware?
>
I supply the same compiler flags to both under Linux and Cygwin (-O and 
some -D defines).  To my knowledge, I'm not using floating point 
emulation.  But if I was, how would I be able to check?


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -