Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<6.0.1.1.0.20040614042613.01f64d30@imap.myrealbox.com>
X-Sender:	tprince AT imap DOT myrealbox DOT com
Date:	Mon, 14 Jun 2004 04:34:35 -0700
To:	"Gerrit P. Haase" <freeweb AT nyckelpiga DOT de>,
	"Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS)" <david DOT billinghurst AT comalco DOT riotinto DOT com DOT au>
From:	Tim Prince <tprince AT computer DOT org>
Subject:	Re: Annoucement: GCC-3.4.0 binary release candidat
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<0-761829503.20040614115120@familiehaase.de>
References:	<8ED2FA87C8ACC04192709688DDFD5F5F09B33A AT calttsv025 DOT cal DOT riotinto DOT org> <0-761829503 DOT 20040614115120 AT familiehaase DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

At 02:51 AM 6/14/2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:

>Hi David,
>
> >> I'm more curious to know how others managed to build gfortran of 3.5.
> >>
> >> Tim Prince
>
> > I am trying to get my mainline gcc builds restarted.  I managed a build
> > overnight, including gfortran.  I am unaware of any magic.
>
>Interesting, should I include gfortran into the distribution?  What do
>you think?
>
>I was able to build the whole GCC suite including Pascal, Modula 2, D
>and also Java without problems now, after I downgraded to  cygwin-1.5.9.
>Which version of cygwin did you use to build Java?  I'm asking since
>the Java build fails for me with cygwin-1.5.10-3 and one newer snapshot I
>tried.
I have done all the Java builds with cygwin-1.5.9.  The internal errors 
which g++-3.4.1 was throwing in libgcj have been corrected.
I started over fresh with the new snapshot of gcc-3.5.0 yesterday, and it 
still refuses to configure gfortran.  Personally, I am much more interested 
in gfortran than in java, so I would be happy if you could put it in the 
distribution.  I would expect some demand for continued availability of 
g77, at least up to the time when gfortran becomes the supported gnu release.

Thanks.


Tim Prince 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -