Mail Archives: cygwin/2004/06/14/01:35:19
Brian Dessent wrote:
> Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
>
>>On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 05:42:38AM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
>>
>>>reserved for real-time processes. The remaining range 1-15 are the
>>>regular (dynamic) priorities that most processes run with. In reality
>>>you don't set the priority directly this way, rather you choose a
>>>priority class (realtime, high, normal, idle; corresponding to 24, 13,
>>>8, 4) and then a modifier (highest, above normal, normal, below normal,
>>>lowest; corresponding to +2, +1, 0, -1, -2).
>>
>>Is that correct? Shouldn't idle be 3 to allow the full 1-15 range?
>
>
> According to sysinternals' Process Explorer, idle is indeed 4. I
> haven't double checked with anything on MSDN but I don't see why it
> would not be displaying the correct thing, given that it shows the
> priority on the 0-31 scale for every process so it must be using the
> NTDLL level calls.
Hmm, that's pretty complex way to do things:
There is actually three levels: Background/Foreground process, base
priority, and then special "thread priority" that has seven more modifiers.
Complete text can be found at:
<http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dllproc/base/scheduling_priorities.asp>
--
Jani Tiainen
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -