Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 7 Jun 2004 10:31:57 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: The cygwin assignment (was [a subject which has been blacklisted, prematurely IMO])
Message-ID:	<20040607143157.GA15068@coe.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<n2m-g DOT ca0sa6 DOT 3vv83lb DOT 1 AT buzzy-box DOT bavag> <20040607041911 DOT GA10312 AT coe DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <00b201c44c69$f86f0940$78d96f83 AT robinson DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<00b201c44c69$f86f0940$78d96f83@robinson.cam.ac.uk>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 09:32:26AM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
>*But* I'd be very interested to see the official response to Bas van
>Gompel's questions, as they echo my own concerns about signing a Cygwin
>assignment.  And I think that information about barriers to
>contributing to Cygwin is on topic.

If you are having difficulty understanding Cygwin's assignment
mechanism, you should take it up directly with Red Hat.  No decision
maker at Red Hat reads this mailing list.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -