delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Message-ID: | <00b201c44c69$f86f0940$78d96f83@robinson.cam.ac.uk> |
From: | "Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net> |
To: | <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
References: | <n2m-g DOT ca0sa6 DOT 3vv83lb DOT 1 AT buzzy-box DOT bavag> <20040607041911 DOT GA10312 AT coe DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> |
Subject: | The Cygwin assignment (was [a subject which has been blacklisted, prematurely IMO]) |
Date: | Mon, 7 Jun 2004 09:32:26 +0100 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: | http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ |
X-Cam-AntiVirus: | No virus found |
X-Cam-SpamDetails: | Not scanned |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Note-from-DJ: | This may be spam |
Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 05:16:08AM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote: >> [multiple recipients: cygwin mailing-list + Rose Naftaly at RedHat] >> Note: This is legal stuff, many of you may want to skip this mail... > > Good advice. > >> In <url:http://cygwin.com/contrib.html> it says to ask questions on >> the mailing-list, while in <url:http://cygwin.com/assign.txt> it says >> to send questions to R. Naftaly. Hence this (b)cc'd message. > > There is no reason to send legal questions here. This list will not > resolve your grievances. Contacting the person in the contrib link > is the correct way to do this. > > Lets not discuss this here any further. There is no reason to subject > the cygwin mailing list to Red Hat specific legal questions. We don't > need a bunch of IANAL's wasting bandwidth with their expert legal > opinions. I agree there's nothing to _discuss_ here - Red Hat's response is definitive. *But* I'd be very interested to see the official response to Bas van Gompel's questions, as they echo my own concerns about signing a Cygwin assignment. And I think that information about barriers to contributing to Cygwin is on topic. Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |