Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Dave Korn" <dk AT artimi DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Re[4]: Visual Studio linking
Date:	Wed, 2 Jun 2004 14:54:47 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Mahogany-0.66.0-796-20040602-144338.00@bakbone.co.uk>
Message-ID:	<NUTMEG1s7nlT2NqFJ3s0000014d@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	02 Jun 2004 13:54:47.0906 (UTC) FILETIME=[2ADDAC20:01C448A9]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Alastair Growcott
> Sent: 02 June 2004 14:44
> To: cygwin
> Subject: Re[4]: Visual Studio linking
> 
> Conclusions:

Real Conclusion:

  You are completely wasting your time in a pointless exercise of cobbling
together a bunch of completely incompatible bits of code that just happen to
have the same function names.

  The internals of C runtime libraries and startup code contain deep black
magic and you haven't a hope in hell of getting gcc lib bits to play nicely
with msvc lib bits.  Even if you managed to translate the names, that
doesn't mean the functions expect the same data as arguments nor will they
use the same data structures in memory.

  Sorry to be so negative, but it really isn't worth pursuing.

    cheers, 
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -