Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Sat, 29 May 2004 12:57:24 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: dll version collision - my old and now broken solution
Message-ID:	<20040529165724.GB8840@coe.bosbc.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<008101c4455f$3d705c40$78d96f83 AT robinson DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<008101c4455f$3d705c40$78d96f83@robinson.cam.ac.uk>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 10:27:43AM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
>Attached is my patch, updated to apply cleanly (though not to work!)
>with current CVS.

In case it isn't obvious, this patch is just a brute force kludge.  Half
of the changes aren't even necessary.  I'm not sure what the patch buys
you over the mechanism used by the test suite but I suspect that the
test suite mechanism wasn't even looked at or understood.

As Max noted this is not something that is officially supported or
sanctioned so if anyone has questions about this patch please send them
to Max Bowsher via personal email.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -