delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Max Bowsher wrote: > > I hadn't planned to package 2.x because its native win32 version would > > be significantly faster with a thread MPM than a Cygwin port. But I > > suppose a Cygwin version would be useful if you wanted to test or > > develop things that are destined for a 2.x/Unix machine. I also don't > > know what's involved with compiling 2.x for Cygwin. Maybe after 1.x and > > the modules are out... > > OK, my reason for asking was because I currently have apr and apr-util > packages pending, so if anyone was to package Apache 2, I'd need to > co-ordinate with them. I have actually got a working cygwin apache 2 to > compile, but it was quite messy, and I have no time to tidy it up at the > moment. Ah, of course. I'll contact you before I start packaging 2.x, if ever. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |