Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<40B5B751.9EB8E456@dessent.net>
Date:	Thu, 27 May 2004 02:39:29 -0700
From:	Brian Dessent <brian AT dessent DOT net>
Organization:	My own little world...
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Looking for new apache maintainer
References:	<20040525234836 DOT GA2243 AT coe DOT bosbc DOT com> <40B53400 DOT 668ECCEF AT dessent DOT net> <000b01c443cb$c6c0e950$78d96f83 AT robinson DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Max Bowsher wrote:
> 
> Brian Dessent wrote:
> > Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >
> >> Is anyone interested in being the maintainer for the Apache package?
> >> The current maintainer is MIA.
> >
> > I would like to volunteer for this.
> 
> Hi Brian,
> 
> Do you intend to maintain Apache 1 or Apache 2?

I hadn't planned to package 2.x because its native win32 version would
be significantly faster with a thread MPM than a Cygwin port.  But I
suppose a Cygwin version would be useful if you wanted to test or
develop things that are destined for a 2.x/Unix machine.  I also don't
know what's involved with compiling 2.x for Cygwin.  Maybe after 1.x and
the modules are out...

Brian

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -