Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 6 May 2004 23:49:06 +0200
From:	Baurjan Ismagulov <ibr AT ata DOT cs DOT hun DOT edu DOT tr>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: newline in patch command output
Message-ID:	<20040506214903.GB2023@ata.cs.hun.edu.tr>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20040505125151 DOT GA20299 AT ata DOT cs DOT hacettepe DOT edu DOT tr> <4098F133 DOT FF888288 AT dessent DOT net> <20040506080853 DOT GD12047 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20040506080853.GD12047@cygbert.vinschen.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.4i
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Hello, Corinna.

On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 10:08:53AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> I'm not sure if it "must", but it's the solution which costs as few grief
> as possible.  I tried various combinations but in the end, writing all
> output files in binary was the only one to stop patch to screw up files
> in one way or the other.
> 
> Since you can be sure that patch creates always LF files, I don't see
> a problem in using unix2dos on them afterwards.  It's reliable.

At first I didn't want it because I thought it would touch the unpatched
files; this seems not to be the case, so I think I can live with it,
although it takes some time to process the whole tree.

Thanks for your time!

With kind regards,
Baurjan.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -