delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Reply-To: | Cygwin List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Message-Id: | <6.1.0.6.0.20040503224923.0313a5e0@127.0.0.1> |
X-Sender: | |
Date: | Mon, 03 May 2004 22:51:00 -0400 |
To: | Jacek Trzmiel <sc0rp AT hot DOT pl>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | Larry Hall <cygwin-lh AT cygwin DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: shutdown( socket, SHUT_WR ) - unexpected behaviour |
In-Reply-To: | <4096FDAA.48D577A2@hot.pl> |
References: | <40941F92 DOT 1DDD3E67 AT hot DOT pl> <20040503114446 DOT GE2201 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <4096FDAA DOT 48D577A2 AT hot DOT pl> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
At 10:19 PM 5/3/2004, you wrote: >> I've tried your application and I'm not able to reproduce your problem. >> The shutdown call does not influence sending the buffered data apparently. > >Thanks for info. > >> I've tested with Cygwin 1.5.9 and with a recent snapshot on XP SP1. >> What's your system? > >Cygwin 1.5.9, Win2kSP2. I made additional test using winsock directly >and got the same buggy result. So it doesn't look like bug in cygwin, >but rather in windows or some 3rd party app that is messing with the >sockets (e.g. NIS). I found similar bugreport in MS KB298871, but it's >marked as WinCE only: > >http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;298871 > >"If an application calls shutdown() to disable only sending from the >socket, later attempts to read data sent to that socket will result in >only portions of the data being received." > > >Can somebody with Win2k box compile and run prog from my previous mail? >I would like to know if it behaves incorrectly only on my system, or on >Win2k in general: I don't know if this answers the question or not but it works fine for me on W2K SP3 (Cygwin 1.5.9 yada, yada)... -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |