Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-To:	Cygwin List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-Id:	<6.1.0.6.0.20040503115531.030994f0@127.0.0.1>
X-Sender:
Date:	Mon, 03 May 2004 11:57:37 -0400
To:	"electa" <electabuzz AT katamail DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Larry Hall <cygwin-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: are rand48() & Co implemented now?
In-Reply-To:	<c75llr$m4k$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:	<c75g9p$7bh$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <20040503135454 DOT GH2201 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <c75llr$m4k$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org>
Mime-Version:	1.0

At 10:41 AM 5/3/2004, you wrote:
>i have used
>#include <stdlib.h>
>but gcc still prints
>"implicit declaration of function lrand48()",
>and "srand48()".


Sorry, I can't reproduce that behavior.  See:

>Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html


The information requested at the URL above plus sample source should help 
clarify where your problem is.


--
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746                     


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -