Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<40923F9D.7070809@ompf.org>
Date:	Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:59:25 +0200
From:	tbp <gcc AT ompf DOT org>
Reply-To:	gcc AT ompf DOT org
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Ross Ridge <rridge AT csclub DOT uwaterloo DOT ca>
CC:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: g++ 3.4.0 cygwin, codegen SSE & alignement issues
References:	<20040430080013 DOT 04A6EA854E AT perpugilliam DOT csclub DOT uwaterloo DOT ca>
In-Reply-To:	<20040430080013.04A6EA854E@perpugilliam.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>

Ross Ridge wrote:
> Try reversing this patch:
> 
> 	http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/i386/cygming.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.7&r2=1.8
Patched gcc 3.4 + patched cygwin1.dll = success. Thanks a lot.

So, i have to ask 2 annoying questions:
a) is Brian Ford patch to threadfunc_fe gonna make it to the official 
cygwin at some point in one form or another?
b) what can be done about the gcc/binutil thing? Should i raise the 
issue with the binutils and/or gcc ppl or just sit on it?


PS: Excuse my ignorance, but is there a way to keep a local copy of 
cygwin1.dll without getting caught by the cygwin-system-consistency police?

-- 
Regards,
	tbp.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -