Mail Archives: cygwin/2004/04/27/16:04:14
Op Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:46:57 -0400
schreef Larry Hall <cygwin-lh te cygwin.com>
in <6 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 6 DOT 0 DOT 20040422133723 DOT 038e2548 AT 127 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 1>:
: At 01:08 PM 4/22/2004, you wrote:
^^^
"Philip Brown" <pbrown00 uit earthlink.net>, not me.
[...]
: > sharutils-4.2.1-3 - Similar to above for file:
: > /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/sharutils.README
: > which should be sharutils-4.2.1-3.README per your configuration system to
: > the best of my understanding.
:
:
: No. The prescribed approach from <http://cygwin.com/setup.html> is:
:
: In your binary package, include a file /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/foo-vendor-
: suffix.README containing (at a minimum) the information needed for an end
: user to recreate the package. This includes CFLAGS settings, configure
: parameters, etc.
:
: This doesn't say any package version number is a requirement. There are
: benefits to leaving the number off (i.e. the same file applies to any
: version).
Then, what is meant by ``-vendor-suffix'' in the above quotation?
L8r,
Buzz.
--
) | | ---/ ---/ Yes, this | This message consists of true | I do not
-- | | / / really is | and false bits entirely. | mail for
) | | / / a 72 by 4 +-------------------------------+ any1 but
-- \--| /--- /--- .sigfile. | |perl -pe "s.u(z)\1.as." | me. 4^re
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -