Message-Id:	<200404230432.i3N4WTSi031967@delorie.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"GARY VANSICKLE" <g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Maildir and Cygwin
Date:	Thu, 22 Apr 2004 23:33:13 -0500
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20040422164005.GA3652@efn.org>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

> On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 08:26:00AM -0700, Eduardo Chappa wrote:
> 
> > :) > that Cygwin is different (e.g. we could do this in the cygwin
> > :) > applications mailing list).
> > :)
> > :) Why do you want to change so many programs when all you need is a
> > :) cygwin managed mount?
> 
> IMO, the correct solution for mutt to make everyone happy would be a
> new configuration variable to specify the character (presumably
> defaulting to non-: for cygwin).  I think I've seen both ; and -
> suggested in different places.

No, all that would do is guarantee that a mutt using ";" couldn't read a
Maildir written by a fetchmail using "-" (i.e. the disagreement would simply
move from being hardcoded to being defined at compile time).  The correct
solution is to implement a corrected spec.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -