Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning:	slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs
Date:	Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:50:57 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Igor Pechtchanski <pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Emulating hard links on FAT et al.
In-Reply-To:	<20040422071930.GA1486@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Message-ID:	<Pine.GSO.4.56.0404220948560.4723@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
References:	<F76C9B2DA2FC4C4CA0A18E288BBCBCF7082177FA AT nihexchange24 DOT nih DOT gov> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 56 DOT 0404201434290 DOT 4141 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 56 DOT 0404201459540 DOT 4141 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <00f001c4270e$5db365c0$66fda287 AT docbill002> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 56 DOT 0404201538541 DOT 4141 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <c64s42$red$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 56 DOT 0404211210110 DOT 23681 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <20040421174819 DOT GA27830 AT coe DOT bosbc DOT com> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 56 DOT 0404211407500 DOT 23681 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <20040422071930 DOT GA1486 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Scanned-By:	MIMEDefang 2.39

On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Corinna Vinschen wrote:

> On Apr 21 14:10, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 01:16:03PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > > >> ntea relies on a set of win32 functions available to NT family only.
> > > >
> > > >Yes, but as I asked -- is that necessary?  I mean, if it will require a
> > > >full rewrite of the ntea functionality, then NT is certainly a
> > > >prerequisite.
> > >
> > > I don't get what you are asking when you say "Is that necessary?"   Are
> > > you suggesting that someone could emulate NTEA functionality in cygwin
> > > on 9x/Me?
> > >
> > > cgf
> >
> > Yes, I'm asking if that's possible (in your and others' educated opinion),
> > and if so, how much estimated effort that will involve.  If there's too
> > much interdependence with the NT API, then it's probably not a good idea,
>
> Have a look into cygwin's ntea.cc.  It uses the NT Backup API which is
> how EA are read or written on NT.  Now try to estimate how long it takes
> to implement something similar on 9x.  I don't think it's worth the
> effort anyway.
>
> Corinna

Thanks, that was essentially what I was asking.  Looks like I (again) was
remiss in my code browsing.  Apologies for the noise.
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_		pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster."  -- Patrick Naughton

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -