Mail Archives: cygwin/2004/04/20/15:20:44
> From: Sam Steingold
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 6:54 PM
> > * chris <***@**.****.**.**> [2004-04-20 16:04:50 +0100]:
> >
> > Personally I would perfer a system where the setup program simply
> > kept a central cache, rather than a seperate cache for each mirror
>
> Indeed!
> While I can easily think of some reasons to keep per-mirror caches
> (e.g., what if the mirrors are out of sync?) it is certainly bad UI to
> make the user aware of this, even indirectly.
> If you really need per-mirror caches, you can hide them from the user
> and always scan all of them.
> This will always be faster than downloading the same file anew.
>
> BTW, what's the policy about the older package tarballs?
> Are they ever removed? (it appears so...)
To get some "help":
Google for the latest "clean_setup.pl".
I have the script below for a standard run of it...
note: /install -> place for setup.exe "local package dir"
-- clean_install_dir --
#!/bin/bash
#This is a shell for the clean_setup.pl script
(
echo -e "\n\n-- ";
date +"$0 run at %F %H:%M %z";
echo -e "\n";
clean_setup.pl -DDir -MFile -keepold -archive OLD-downloads $*
) \
\
| tee -a /install/clean_setup.log
-- eof --
/Hannu E K Nevalainen, B.Sc. EE - 59+16.37'N, 17+12.60'E
** on a mailing list; please keep replies on that particular list **
-- printf("LocalTime: UTC+%02d\n",(DST)? 2:1); --
--END OF MESSAGE--
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -