Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"E. Weddington" <eric AT ecentral DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 16 Apr 2004 17:26:16 -0600
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: Souldn't we put [cygwin] or [CygXwin] here depending on the question?
Message-ID:	<40801738.12970.48BEFA44@localhost>
In-reply-to:	<20040416200951.GA13791@coe.bosbc.com>
X-Virus-Scanned:	by amavisd 2003.09.17 on emu

On 16 Apr 2004 at 16:09, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> Sorry.  The list administrator is not interested in having *his* email
> cluttered with extraneous words in the subject.
> 
> It is NOT GOING TO HAPPEN.  Is that clear?  No amount of pleading is
> going to change the policy in any group that I run.

Um, shouldn't you check with your *co-project lead* too?
<http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-03/msg01568.html>

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -