Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Dave Korn" <dk AT artimi DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Comparative Performance of C++ Compilers (including gcc cygming special)
Date:	Wed, 14 Apr 2004 11:02:52 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0404140326120.1753@pervalidus.dyndns.org>
Message-ID:	<NUTMEGAMDmZ5fgSdmlm00000456@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	14 Apr 2004 10:02:52.0953 (UTC) FILETIME=[A6AA9890:01C42207]
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id i3EA4ImW023205

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Frédéric L. W. Meunier
> Sent: 14 April 2004 07:35

> Anyway, does anybody know if GCC in Cygwin is compiled with
> --disable-checking ? gcc -v didn't return it, so it doesn't
> look like. It seems using it causes compilation times to
> decrease a lot.


  --disable-checking is the default.  You only get a checking build of gcc
if you explicitly specify --enable-checking on the configure command line.
So cygming gcc should be a non-checking build.


    cheers, 
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
 



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -