Mail Archives: cygwin/2004/04/08/22:34:13
[You left very little context. I added some.]
Op Thu, 8 Apr 2004 21:00:34 -0400
schreef Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please op cygwin.com>
in <20040409010034 DOT GA3252 AT coc DOT bosbc DOT com>:
Christopher Faylor:
> :: We also do not want to export _r functions which are unique only to
> :: newlib. For instance, I suspect that _mallopt_r is probably not
> :: something that we want to export since no other UNIX has it.
: > That's not what was asked...
:
: Aren't you glad I clarified?
Yeah, sure. But this means I won't be able to help any further
with this, as I don't know which UNIXes export which functions,.
I hope the lists will help narrow down the search, anyway.
[...]
: ...apparently not...
: -/
(I'll think thrice, before trying to help out here again.)
And I asked: Why not export '_mallopt_r' when 'mallopt' is?
(I don't think many UNIXes have 'mallopt', and it is newlib-
specific...)
Maybe l8r,
Buzz.
--
) | | ---/ ---/ Yes, this | This message consists of true | I do not
-- | | / / really is | and false bits entirely. | mail for
) | | / / a 72 by 4 +-------------------------------+ any1 but
-- \--| /--- /--- .sigfile. | |perl -pe "s.u(z)\1.as." | me. 4^re
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -