Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 8 Apr 2004 11:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
From:	"Peter A. Castro" <doctor AT fruitbat DOT org>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Gcc/ld and long command lines (> 32k)
In-Reply-To:	<20040408172115.GB24612@coc.bosbc.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.4.53.0404081059590.1010@gremlin.fruitbat.org>
References:	<Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 50 DOT 0404081719370 DOT 380-100000 AT pjakkur DOT iar DOT se> <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 53 DOT 0404080943250 DOT 1010 AT gremlin DOT fruitbat DOT org> <20040408172115 DOT GB24612 AT coc DOT bosbc DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 10:00:56AM -0700, Peter A. Castro wrote:
> >The @filename syntax is used by MS's linker (Visual C++/Studio).  To my
> >knowledge gcc's linker doesn't support this syntax.
>
> The cygwin DLL supports it (implemented over my gagged and thrashing body)
> but only at a non-cygwin-shell command prompt, e.g.,

Good Gravy!!  Yikes!!  *Tell me* this is a late April Fool's joke!!  Please!!

> c:\>gcc -o foo @foo.blah
>
> works
>
> but
>
> bash$ gcc -o foo @foo.blah
>
> doesn't.
>
> I would highly recommend against using this construct, however.  It's better
> to use traditional unix methods for working around this problem.  Cygwin isn't
> the only unix-like system out there with a measly amount of space set aside for
> the command line.

The original post doesn't specify weither they are working inside of or
outside of a Cygwin environment, but from some of the comments I kinda
think it maybe outside of.  Something like:

On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Johan Holmberg wrote:
>   Is ld.exe not interpreting the special "@" like other
>   Cygwin programs ?

Kinda makes me think he's running this from outside of any Cygwin shell.

But, my original suggestion, as well as your mention above, still stands:
use traditional unix methods, like static-link archive libraries.
Related to, but just as problematic, would be turning all of those object
files into a shared-library/DLL, which I encourage the original poster to
also consider if this program is ment to be run concurrently.

> cgf

-- 
Peter A. Castro <doctor AT fruitbat DOT org> or <Peter DOT Castro AT oracle DOT com>
	"Cats are just autistic Dogs" -- Dr. Tony Attwood

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -