Mail Archives: cygwin/2004/04/04/22:46:19
On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, GARY VANSICKLE wrote:
> > Noo... Please, remove all of these safety checks.
> > There must be some kind of user sanity presupposition. Or else the tools
> > soon will be crippled to a state where they are unusable for normal work.
>
> FWIW I'm with Hannu. Should rm ask you, "Do you *really* want to delete
> this file?", or make a backup of every file you delete (ala the Recycle
> Bin)? It should according to the thinking in this thread.
That's what the "-i" flag is for. :-) But guess what? It's not the
default!
IOW, I agree here. The safety checks don't work (as I showed in
<http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-04/msg00116.html>), and they prevent a
legitimate use of the program. If you really want to be safe, run "file"
before running "d2u/u2d". Or, leave the safety checks in, but only if a
"--safe" (or whatever the appropriate name is) flag is given.
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster." -- Patrick Naughton
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -