Mail Archives: cygwin/2004/04/03/11:45:42
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 06:32:16AM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
>On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Hans Horn wrote:
>
>> this was something I did try out as well. However, the dll produced with
>> "-no-cygwin" was just as "bad" as before.
>> Then I recalled faintly reading some discussion a while back, that
>> "mingw-gcc != gcc -no-cygwin" (don't remember details, though).
>
>-no-cygwin ? I thought it was -mno-cygwin. Or are both the same
>thing ?
The correct switch is -mno-cygwin. -mno-cygwin should be equivalent to
building with the mingw compiler unless you try to include cygwin header
files or libraries, which is a common mistake.
--
Christopher Faylor spammer? -> aaaspammer AT sourceware DOT org
Cygwin Co-Project Leader hank AT duffek DOT org
TimeSys, Inc.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -