Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<40640243.2080407@luukku.com>
Date:	Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:13:23 +0200
From:	Jani tiainen <redetin AT luukku DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5+ (Windows/20040302)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cygwin under Wine?
References:	<6 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20040325194138 DOT 028547a0 AT pop DOT rcn DOT com> <OF9F508893 DOT 6F941F4F-ON85256E63 DOT 0004A326-85256E63 DOT 000566F4 AT us DOT ibm DOT com> <6 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20040325201031 DOT 02854fd8 AT pop DOT rcn DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<6.0.1.1.0.20040325201031.02854fd8@pop.rcn.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Larry Hall wrote:

> 
>>At 07:33 PM 3/25/2004, Tom Roche wrote:
>>
>>>While sounding out Cygwin users in my organization, I got the
>>>comment:
>>
>>>>If Cygwin would run under Wine, I'd be a very happy person, we
>>>>wouldn't need real Windows machines for builds, and we could
>>>>consign all our Windows build machines, their ITSC compliance, and
>>>>the continual stream of updates and security fixes to the deepest
>>>>pits of hell.

Um, why an earth someone might run cygwin under wine? What's the catch? 
If I understood correctly cygwin is meant to provide *nix things for 
windows environment. (Including compilation tools, besides all others) 
So why an earth windows targeted software run under cygwin? If software 
is meant to be crossplatform that's an another story...

> So are you saying that it's not a requirement that your build environment
> running under Wine be able to run smoke/unit/function tests but it would
> be for a cross-compiler environment would?  Yikes!  OK, maybe I 
> misunderstood what you're saying with the above but if that's 
> the case, it seems to me that the bigger concern should be "will the
> software built under Wine run under Wine"?  Unless you know that's the case,
> you're putting the cart before the horse.  And, as I type this, I have
> the strangest feeling of deja-vu, like this is exactly the same comment
> that was made the last time this subject came up. ;-)

Well, it's pretty easy to write software that can be built under wine, 
but doesn't run well or at all under wine.

Another thing is issues that might arise under real windows environment 
that doesn't exists under wine (like windows file locking, permissions 
and such.)

-- 

Jani Tiainen

"Bureaucrats! Official complaint is like trying to get drunk with root 
beer."
  - Wagner in Viivi & Wagner comics.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -