Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-To:	Cygwin List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-Id:	<6.0.1.1.0.20040325104702.03b5a8a0@127.0.0.1>
X-Sender:
Date:	Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:48:03 -0500
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Larry Hall <cygwin-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: RE: 1.5.5.1 posix conformance for sigaction()
Cc:	gshyam AT denver DOT india DOT mentorg DOT com, harsh_arora AT mentorg DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<20040325150802.GA4123@redhat.com>
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10403251336200 DOT 4671-100000 AT denver DOT india DOT mentorg DOT com> <20040325150802 DOT GA4123 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0

At 10:08 AM 3/25/2004, you wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 01:37:24PM +0000, Ghanshyam wrote:
>>Thanks for your attention. But I found the second result (two SIGCHLD) in
>>both the cases. I m using the cygwin version 1.5.5.1 
>
>Given that the current version of cygwin is 1.5.10, does that possibly

                                             ^^^^^^^
                                 should read 1.5.9 (soon to be followed
                                                    by 1.5.10 ;-) )

>suggest something to you?

--
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746                     


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -