| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Date: | Wed, 24 Mar 2004 20:18:11 +0000 (GMT) |
| From: | Ghanshyam <gshyam AT denver DOT india DOT mentorg DOT com> |
| To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| cc: | harsh_arora AT mentorg DOT com |
| Subject: | 1.5.5.1 sysconf() NOT implemented for _SC_STREAM_MAX and _SC_TZNAME_MAX? |
| Message-ID: | <Pine.LNX.4.10.10403242013550.3101-100000@denver.india.mentorg.com> |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Hi all,
I found some problem in sysconf() system call with respect to following
assertions defined in "IEEE std 2003.1 -1992 Test methods for measuring
conformance to POSIX-part1" document
10(A) If STREAM_MAX is defined when the header <limits.h> is included:
A call to sysconf(_SC_STREAM_MAX) either returns -1 without changing errno
or returns a value greater than or equal to {STREAM_MAX}.
Otherwise:
A call to sysconf(_SC_STREAM_MAX) either returns -1 without changing errno
or returns a value greater than or equal to {_POSIX_STREAM_MAX}.
11(A) If TZNAME_MAX is defined when the header <limits.h> is included:
A call to sysconf(_SC_TZNAME_MAX) either returns -1 without changing errno
or returns a value greater than or equal to {TZNAME_MAX}.
Otherwise:
A call to sysconf(_SC_TZNAME_MAX) either returns -1 without changing errno
or returns a value greater than or equal to {_POSIX_TZNAME_MAX}.
********when called with argument _SC_STREAM_MAX or _SC_TZNAME_MAX, It
returns -1 but set errno to 22 (EINVAL) but is should not modify its
value.
By looking into code, I found that sysconf() is not implemented for these
argument values! Is any one going to address these in near future?
Thanks and regards,
ghanshyam
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |