Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 24 Mar 2004 20:13:39 +0000 (GMT)
From:	Ghanshyam <gshyam AT denver DOT india DOT mentorg DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
cc:	harsh_arora AT mentorg DOT com
Subject:	1.5.5.1 posix conformance for strftime()
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.4.10.10403242009240.3101-100000@denver.india.mentorg.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0

Hi all,

I found some problem in strftime system call with respect to following
assertion defined in "IEEE std 2003.1 -1992 Test methods for measuring
conformance to POSIX-part1" document:

07(A)	A call to strftime() sets the external variable tzname[0] to point	
	to the standard time-zone designation and
	tzname[1] to point to the summer time-zone designation corresponding to
	the current value of the TZ
	environment variable.


********It doesnt set the values of tzname[0] and tzname[1]. The old
values are retained.

I have gone through the code and found that perhaps code is not written to
set the values of tzname[0] and tzname[1] according to TZ environment
variable. Isnt it?


with thanks and regards,

ghanshyam


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -